Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@thehunmonkgroup

thehunmonkgroup/summary.md

Created September 8, 2024 23:03
Show Gist options
  • Save thehunmonkgroup/921697bb14603e0ccd0c4d442118b7fa to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save thehunmonkgroup/921697bb14603e0ccd0c4d442118b7fa to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Summary: LONG CITE: ENABLING LLMS TO GENERATE FINE GRAINED CITATIONS IN LONG-CONTEXT QA
Raw
summary.md

URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.02897.pdf

LONG CITE: ENABLING LLMS TO GENERATE FINE GRAINED CITATIONS IN LONG-CONTEXT QA

QUESTION 1:

Can you give me a very clear explanation of the core assertions, implications, and mechanics elucidated in this paper?

ANSWER 1:

Certainly. I'll provide a clear explanation of the core assertions, implications, and mechanics described in this paper:

Core Assertions:

  1. Current long-context large language models (LLMs) lack the ability to generate fine-grained citations for their responses, which impacts their trustworthiness and verifiability.

  2. The authors propose a method to enable LLMs to generate accurate responses with fine-grained sentence-level citations from lengthy contexts in a single output.

  3. The paper introduces LongCite-45k, a large-scale supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset for long-context question answering with citations (LQAC).

  4. The authors train two models, LongCite-8B and LongCite-9B, which achieve state-of-the-art citation quality, surpassing even larger proprietary models.

  5. Fine-tuning with citation information not only improves citation generation but also enhances response correctness compared to standard long-context fine-tuning.

Key Implications:

  1. Improved trustworthiness and verifiability of long-context LLMs by providing fine-grained citations.

  2. Enhanced ability of LLMs to utilize context information more uniformly and comprehensively.

  3. Reduction in hallucinations and unfaithful content generation by LLMs.

  4. A new benchmark (LongBench-Cite) and evaluation methodology for assessing LQAC performance.

  5. Potential for further research and development in making LLMs more reliable and transparent.

Mechanics:

  1. LongBench-Cite: An automatic benchmark to evaluate LLMs' performance on LQAC, covering multiple tasks in both English and Chinese.

  2. CoF (Coarse to Fine) Pipeline: A novel method to automatically construct high-quality LQAC instances with precise sentence-level citations. It consists of four main steps: a) QA instance generation using Self-Instruct b) Chunk-level citation generation c) Sentence-level citation extraction d) Data filtering

  3. LongCite-45k Dataset: Created using the CoF pipeline, containing 44,600 high-quality LQAC instances with contexts up to 128,000 tokens.

  4. Model Training: Fine-tuning GLM-4-9B and Llama-3.1-8B on LongCite-45k dataset to create LongCite-9B and LongCite-8B models.

  5. Evaluation: Using both automatic metrics (correctness, citation quality) and human evaluation to assess model performance.

The paper demonstrates a significant advancement in enabling LLMs to generate more trustworthy and verifiable responses in long-context scenarios, with potential applications across various domains requiring accurate information retrieval and citation.

QUESTION 2:

Can you explain the value of this in basic terms? Like you're talking to a CEO. So what? What's the bottom line here?

ANSWER 2:

Certainly. Here's a straightforward explanation of the value of this research, as if speaking to a CEO:

Bottom line: This research solves a major trust problem with AI language models, making them much more reliable and useful for businesses.

Here's why it matters:

  1. Accountability: Right now, when AI gives you an answer from a long document, you can't easily verify if it's correct. This research teaches AI to cite its sources, just like a good employee would.

  2. Reduced Risk: By providing citations, the AI is less likely to make things up or give incorrect information. This lowers the risk of making decisions based on faulty AI outputs.

  3. Time Savings: Instead of having to double-check everything the AI says, you can quickly verify its most important claims by looking at the cited sections. This saves valuable time for your team.

  4. Better Decision Making: The AI can now give you a comprehensive view of long documents, using information from throughout the text, not just the beginning. This leads to more informed decisions.

  5. Competitive Advantage: This technology outperforms even the most advanced AI models from big tech companies. Implementing it could give your company an edge in AI-driven tasks.

  6. Versatility: It works across different languages and types of tasks, making it useful for various departments and international operations.

  7. Foundation for Future Growth: This opens up possibilities for using AI more confidently in sensitive areas like legal, financial, or medical fields, where accuracy and traceability are crucial.

In essence, this makes AI a more trustworthy, efficient, and powerful tool for your business, reducing risks and opening new opportunities for AI application in critical areas of your operations.

QUESTION 3:

Can you give me an analogy or metaphor that will help explain this to a broad audience?

ANSWER 3:

Certainly! Here's an analogy that could help explain this research to a broad audience:

Imagine you're building a house, and you hire an incredibly fast and efficient robot to help you. This robot can read through thousands of pages of building codes, architectural plans, and safety regulations in seconds, and then give you advice on how to build your house.

Now, here's the problem: While the robot is quick and often correct, sometimes it mixes up information or even makes things up. You can't be sure if it's telling you to use steel beams because that's what the building code requires, or if it just made that up. This means you constantly have to double-check its work, which defeats the purpose of having such a fast helper.

What this research does is like upgrading this robot with a new feature: Now, every time the robot gives you advice, it also hands you a sticky note with the exact page number and paragraph from the building codes or architectural plans where it got that information.

Here's why this upgrade is so valuable:

  1. Trust: You can now trust the robot's advice more because you can verify its sources quickly.

  2. Efficiency: You don't have to waste time double-checking everything; you can focus on the most critical parts.

  3. Comprehensive understanding: The robot now uses information from all the documents, not just the first few pages, giving you a more complete picture.

  4. Reduced mistakes: Because the robot has to "show its work", it's less likely to make things up or mix up information.

  5. Better than the competition: This upgraded robot is even better at providing accurate, sourceable information than the most advanced robots from big tech companies.

In essence, this research is like giving AI a highlighter and sticky notes, allowing it to show its work and sources. This makes the AI a much more trustworthy and useful assistant, especially when dealing with large amounts of information - just like how you'd want your robot helper to be when building a house!

QUESTION 4:

Can you provide a specific example that best illustrates the key points elucidated in this paper?

ANSWER 4:

Certainly! I'll provide a specific example that illustrates the key points of the paper:

Imagine a lawyer is working on a complex case involving international trade law. She needs to review a 500-page document of trade agreements and regulations to answer a specific question about tariff exceptions for certain agricultural products.

Without the technology described in this paper: The lawyer might ask a standard AI assistant: "What are the tariff exceptions for organic fruit imports from South America?"

The AI might respond: "Organic fruit imports from South America are exempt from tariffs if they meet certain sustainability criteria and are certified by approved agencies. This exemption was introduced to promote fair trade and support small-scale farmers."

While this answer seems plausible, the lawyer has no way to quickly verify if it's accurate or where in the 500-page document this information comes from. She would have to spend hours searching through the document to confirm the AI's response.

With the technology described in this paper: Using a model like LongCite-9B, the lawyer asks the same question.

The AI responds: Organic fruit imports from South America are exempt from tariffs under specific conditions:[127-129] 1. They must be certified by agencies approved by the International Organic Accreditation Service.[130-131] 2. The exporting farm must meet sustainability criteria, including water conservation and biodiversity protection measures.[132-134] 3. The exemption applies only to farms with less than 50 hectares of land, to support small-scale farmers.[135-136] This exemption was introduced in the 2018 amendment to promote fair trade practices.[140-141]

This response illustrates key points from the paper:

  1. Fine-grained citations: The AI provides specific sentence-level citations for each piece of information, allowing for easy verification.

  2. Comprehensive use of context: The AI draws information from different parts of the document (sentences 127-141), showing it's not just focusing on one section.

  3. Structured response: The answer is organized into clear statements, each with its own citation.

  4. Reduced risk of hallucination: By providing specific citations, the AI is less likely to invent or misstate information.

  5. Efficiency: The lawyer can quickly verify the most important points by checking the cited sentences, rather than searching the entire document.

  6. Improved trustworthiness: The lawyer can be more confident in the AI's response because it's backed by specific citations.

This example demonstrates how the technology described in the paper can make AI assistants more reliable, efficient, and trustworthy, especially when dealing with long, complex documents in professional settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment