Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@suriya

suriya/gist:605f65fa2607c7b010f1a2b198d64e66

Created June 26, 2016 10:47
Show Gist options
  • Save suriya/605f65fa2607c7b010f1a2b198d64e66 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save suriya/605f65fa2607c7b010f1a2b198d64e66 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
gistfile1.txt
Distance (Score) 0.0
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.0001433401630492881
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.11896918714046478
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Celina Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.1263512820005417
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.1263512820005417
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.2914094924926758
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.31122729182243347
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.31122729182243347
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3228866755962372
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3228866755962372
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3428277373313904
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3428277373313904
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.344768762588501
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.349752277135849
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3608684539794922
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3608684539794922
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3608684539794922
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3608684539794922
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3804868459701538
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3804868459701538
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.3993108868598938
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4167039394378662
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4167039394378662
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4322095811367035
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.43352261185646057
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.43352261185646057
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4437544047832489
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4437544047832489
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4623575806617737
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.4828483760356903
Link Content Length 92
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.49700042605400085
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5027175545692444
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5043910145759583
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5101702213287354
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5101702213287354
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5248556733131409
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5260595679283142
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5319554805755615
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5352302193641663
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5352302193641663
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5443400740623474
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5469692349433899
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5578230619430542
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5590881705284119
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5590881705284119
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5607752799987793
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5641091465950012
Link Content Length 93
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.572659432888031
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5937870740890503
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5954241752624512
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5954241752624512
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5954241752624512
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.5970031023025513
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6037846207618713
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.623186469078064
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.623186469078064
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.623186469078064
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6240723133087158
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6240723133087158
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6264224052429199
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6264224052429199
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6264224052429199
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6290263533592224
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6290263533592224
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6332420706748962
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6332420706748962
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6332420706748962
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6344095468521118
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.635301947593689
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6375060677528381
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6391626596450806
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6391626596450806
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6391626596450806
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.639894962310791
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6412122249603271
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6440364718437195
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6497108340263367
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6599293351173401
Link Content Length 98
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6599293351173401
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6715795397758484
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.6809489130973816
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7086787819862366
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7086787819862366
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7142428755760193
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'same.\n\n 20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7142428755760193
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7142428755760193
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7423545122146606
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7423545122146606
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7423545122146606
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7700808048248291
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7784863710403442
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.7810954451560974
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8011543154716492
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8050106167793274
Link Content Length 24
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8124363422393799
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8124363422393799
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8124363422393799
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.814167857170105
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8165632486343384
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8293426036834717
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8293426036834717
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.831039547920227
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8314446806907654
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8315203189849854
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8366723656654358
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8366723656654358
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8366723656654358
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8366723656654358
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8397663235664368
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8422250151634216
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8451229929924011
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8451229929924011
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8451229929924011
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8484220504760742
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8498424291610718
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.876971960067749
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8773180246353149
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8775964379310608
Link Content Length 102
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8829496502876282
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8836684226989746
Link Content Length 24
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8858324289321899
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8904831409454346
Link Content Length 99
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 10972 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI Vs. M/S WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8915275931358337
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.892953634262085
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8937500715255737
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'the plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8949184417724609
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.896353542804718
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.896353542804718
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.8964427709579468
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'fact (see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 22950 BADAT AND CO. Vs. EAST INDIA TRADING CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.898358166217804
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.901361346244812
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9029412865638733
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9051016569137573
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9070271253585815
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9070271253585815
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9070271253585815
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9075360298156738
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9075360298156738
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9093319773674011
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9093319773674011
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9118032455444336
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9124159812927246
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9137642979621887
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9141747951507568
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.91582190990448
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9164075255393982
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9167042970657349
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9179114699363708
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9179114699363708
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9212812781333923
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9255933165550232
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9256244897842407
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9290987849235535
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9315198063850403
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9340150356292725
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9364286065101624
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9380185008049011
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9405797719955444
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9422553777694702
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9445340037345886
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9507673382759094
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 3440 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA Vs. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9507673382759094
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 12649 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA Vs. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9521988034248352
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9521988034248352
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9542124271392822
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9542124271392822
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.954666018486023
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.954666018486023
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.955488920211792
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.959758460521698
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 18963 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Vs. C.M. KOTHARI, MADRAS (DEAD), AND AFTER HIM HIS LEGAL
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.959758460521698
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 18963 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Vs. C.M. KOTHARI, MADRAS (DEAD), AND AFTER HIM HIS LEGAL
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9608781933784485
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9608781933784485
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9608781933784485
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9742577075958252
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9762741923332214
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9838701486587524
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9845656156539917
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9901330471038818
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.991193413734436
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9920141100883484
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9932471513748169
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9932471513748169
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9942150712013245
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.9968774914741516
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 0.998420238494873
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0020259618759155
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0020259618759155
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.009229063987732
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 1531 CHOWGULE & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.009229063987732
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 1531 CHOWGULE & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0096330642700195
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0096330642700195
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0099650621414185
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0102847814559937
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.013179063796997
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0175306797027588
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0208660364151
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0235077142715454
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0275217294692993
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[3], a'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0308094024658203
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0324455499649048
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0324455499649048
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0328078269958496
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0346274375915527
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0346274375915527
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0363777875900269
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.037856101989746
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0387413501739502
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0387413501739502
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0387413501739502
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0417215824127197
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.042510747909546
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0433777570724487
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[3], a'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0443589687347412
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0481278896331787
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0541857481002808
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.05435311794281
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0578218698501587
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0584778785705566
Link Content Length 97
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0589312314987183
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0589338541030884
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0589338541030884
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0594594478607178
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0594594478607178
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0595371723175049
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.059661626815796
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0611343383789062
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0612114667892456
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0612114667892456
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0615384578704834
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0619795322418213
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.062004804611206
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.062004804611206
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.063801646232605
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.064112663269043
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0642011165618896
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0645900964736938
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0649751424789429
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0656287670135498
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0662956237792969
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0670562982559204
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0690383911132812
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0702537298202515
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0704684257507324
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0704684257507324
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0704684257507324
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0704684257507324
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0783125162124634
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0796781778335571
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0796781778335571
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.080241084098816
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0818794965744019
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18388 THE INDIAN OXYGEN LIMITED Vs. WORKMEN AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0830029249191284
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0830029249191284
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.083472490310669
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.084187626838684
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0847386121749878
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0871275663375854
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.089128017425537
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0941393375396729
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.094262719154358
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0946667194366455
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0952658653259277
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of'
Link Target 18963 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Vs. C.M. KOTHARI, MADRAS (DEAD), AND AFTER HIM HIS LEGAL
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0965205430984497
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.0982835292816162
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1020960807800293
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1020960807800293
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1040135622024536
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.104062557220459
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.105766773223877
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.105906367301941
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case,'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.105906367301941
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1063730716705322
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case,'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1063730716705322
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1074583530426025
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1074583530426025
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1076786518096924
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1079225540161133
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1087666749954224
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1088244915008545
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.109241247177124
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1098971366882324
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18556 HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. THE WORKMEN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1133993864059448
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1142162084579468
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1142162084579468
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.114302635192871
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1145612001419067
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1145612001419067
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1152197122573853
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1155409812927246
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.115654706954956
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1160846948623657
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1162594556808472
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.116287350654602
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.116287350654602
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1164603233337402
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1168030500411987
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1169191598892212
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.11693274974823
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1184898614883423
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1196532249450684
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1196532249450684
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1244322061538696
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1248090267181396
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 18963 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Vs. C.M. KOTHARI, MADRAS (DEAD), AND AFTER HIM HIS LEGAL
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1249377727508545
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1259931325912476
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 1531 CHOWGULE & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1259931325912476
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 1531 CHOWGULE & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.133639931678772
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1345468759536743
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 4283 NATH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1356115341186523
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case, this'
Link Target 22932 M/S. RAM NARAIN SONS LTD. Vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS(and other case
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1358402967453003
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1367992162704468
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1418205499649048
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts'
Link Target 13003 COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX Vs. LEATHER FACTS CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1420650482177734
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts'
Link Target 13003 COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX Vs. LEATHER FACTS CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1422125101089478
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1422125101089478
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1430457830429077
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 34070 MAHADEO NARAYAN MORE & ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1511656045913696
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case,'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1511656045913696
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1520135402679443
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1520135402679443
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.152256965637207
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 3434 SALES TAX OFFICER, SECTOR IX, KANPUR Vs. DEALING DAIRY PRODUCTS AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 19
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1534665822982788
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1548062562942505
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1569199562072754
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1569199562072754
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1577191352844238
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1577191352844238
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1577836275100708
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1577951908111572
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1577951908111572
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1585936546325684
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1587986946105957
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1587986946105957
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1594963073730469
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1594963073730469
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1594963073730469
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1602774858474731
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1610807180404663
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts rests'
Link Target 13003 COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX Vs. LEATHER FACTS CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1621193885803223
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1622177362442017
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1622177362442017
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1622177362442017
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1622177362442017
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1622177362442017
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1635031700134277
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.164088487625122
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1642987728118896
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1642987728118896
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.169142484664917
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1698600053787231
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1698600053787231
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1720155477523804
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 3440 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA Vs. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1720155477523804
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 12649 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA Vs. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1725581884384155
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1725581884384155
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1733741760253906
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1733741760253906
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1737381219863892
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1737381219863892
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1741694211959839
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1743099689483643
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1743099689483643
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.174458622932434
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.176316499710083
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.176316499710083
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.177168369293213
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.177168369293213
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1776337623596191
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1778564453125
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1778564453125
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1800850629806519
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1800850629806519
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1800850629806519
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1806564331054688
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1814556121826172
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1823716163635254
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1827832460403442
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1837199926376343
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1846280097961426
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1846280097961426
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1851832866668701
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1855133771896362
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1861101388931274
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1875816583633423
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1875816583633423
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1880104541778564
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1882473230361938
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1882473230361938
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1884628534317017
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'to a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.18863844871521
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.18863844871521
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.18863844871521
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.190180778503418
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.190453290939331
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1905617713928223
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.191449522972107
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.191449522972107
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1916728019714355
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1919560432434082
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1924643516540527
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1936789751052856
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1939263343811035
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1946711540222168
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1946754455566406
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1949833631515503
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1955342292785645
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.196000576019287
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1965126991271973
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'to a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1976463794708252
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.1991276741027832
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2004672288894653
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2004672288894653
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2004672288894653
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2004672288894653
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2038577795028687
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2049998044967651
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2053738832473755
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2064721584320068
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2064721584320068
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2064721584320068
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2064721584320068
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.206565499305725
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2072547674179077
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2076586484909058
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2076586484909058
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2076586484909058
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2079553604125977
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2079553604125977
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2080172300338745
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2083176374435425
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2091552019119263
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2097692489624023
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2097692489624023
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2099217176437378
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2103965282440186
Link Content Length 92
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2106990814208984
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[2], it'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2112301588058472
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.211252212524414
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2114325761795044
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2114325761795044
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2121059894561768
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2134069204330444
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2136030197143555
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 476 SRI SARANGADEVAR PERIA MATAM AND ANOTHER Vs. RAMASWAMY GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2136218547821045
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2143909931182861
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2143909931182861
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.214516282081604
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.214667558670044
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.214667558670044
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2150520086288452
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2157567739486694
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.215996503829956
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this'
Link Target 18963 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Vs. C.M. KOTHARI, MADRAS (DEAD), AND AFTER HIM HIS LEGAL
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2163565158843994
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2172572612762451
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2176737785339355
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.218533992767334
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.219504952430725
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.219504952430725
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.219504952430725
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2195178270339966
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'the plaintiff.\n\n 18. In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2],'
Link Target 102 Binapani Paul Vs. Pratima Ghosh & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2196608781814575
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'is required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 5073 Div.Mangr.Plantn.Div.Andaman&Nicobar; IS. Vs. Munnu Barrick&Ors.;
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2203963994979858
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 20407 CELINA COELHO PEREIRA & ORS. Vs. ULHAS MAHABALESHWAR KHOLKAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2211509943008423
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2218043804168701
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2233445644378662
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 476 SRI SARANGADEVAR PERIA MATAM AND ANOTHER Vs. RAMASWAMY GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2236607074737549
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2240245342254639
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2244213819503784
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2244435548782349
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2256104946136475
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2264363765716553
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2274961471557617
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2274961471557617
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2274961471557617
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 31277 ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.229203462600708
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2293071746826172
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2296700477600098
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2302976846694946
Link Content Length 98
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2302976846694946
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.230899691581726
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.230934977531433
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2311164140701294
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2329380512237549
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2332059144973755
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2336640357971191
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2336640357971191
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2336640357971191
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2336640357971191
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2339286804199219
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2341092824935913
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2344512939453125
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'is required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2345894575119019
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2349191904067993
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.235259771347046
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.235652208328247
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.236124873161316
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.236124873161316
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2363030910491943
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.23704993724823
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2375807762145996
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2375807762145996
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2391412258148193
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2398691177368164
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2398691177368164
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2401098012924194
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2402043342590332
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2402043342590332
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.240993618965149
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2412725687026978
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2417316436767578
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2423475980758667
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2423475980758667
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2437489032745361
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2437489032745361
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2452800273895264
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2462742328643799
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2462742328643799
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2463935613632202
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2467588186264038
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2470340728759766
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'a two-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2474814653396606
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.247761607170105
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.247761607170105
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.247761607170105
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.248335599899292
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 12873 C. A. RAJENDRAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2500066757202148
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2500066757202148
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2500104904174805
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.251783013343811
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2521635293960571
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.25244140625
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 476 SRI SARANGADEVAR PERIA MATAM AND ANOTHER Vs. RAMASWAMY GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2527883052825928
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.253851056098938
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2538797855377197
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2549536228179932
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2550550699234009
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2550550699234009
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2550550699234009
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2550550699234009
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2550550699234009
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2552251815795898
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2554594278335571
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2557957172393799
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and others[2], it'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2563166618347168
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2563166618347168
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2564140558242798
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2566230297088623
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2567670345306396
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2568641901016235
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2570546865463257
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2572520971298218
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2572520971298218
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2574225664138794
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2574578523635864
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2574578523635864
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2576953172683716
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2580891847610474
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2590237855911255
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2596369981765747
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2636361122131348
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2636361122131348
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2656155824661255
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2658116817474365
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2659330368041992
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6]'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2659330368041992
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2659330368041992
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2664018869400024
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2664018869400024
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2665948867797852
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2665948867797852
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2666163444519043
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.267086148262024
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2672278881072998
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 17367 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA Vs. M/S BEDI & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2674565315246582
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2714141607284546
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2717082500457764
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2717100381851196
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2718781232833862
Link Content Length 102
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2720434665679932
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2721608877182007
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.272226333618164
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.272226333618164
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.272226333618164
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.272226333618164
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2723368406295776
Link Content Length 97
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.272438883781433
Link Content Length 99
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 2794 M/S. A-ONE GRANITES Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2724624872207642
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2725194692611694
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '-Judge Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2728040218353271
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2728040218353271
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2728040218353271
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2728040218353271
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2731847763061523
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2739917039871216
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2739917039871216
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2739917039871216
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2748080492019653
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2768056392669678
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2768056392669678
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2768056392669678
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2772631645202637
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a mode'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2774168252944946
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 19840 JADU GOPAL CHAKRAVARTHY (DEAD) AFTER HIM HIS LEGA Vs. PANNALAL BHOWMICK AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2776403427124023
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2776561975479126
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2783883810043335
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2783883810043335
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2784193754196167
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2786513566970825
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2786513566970825
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2786909341812134
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2791547775268555
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2792195081710815
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2794221639633179
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2801307439804077
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2805020809173584
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2805393934249878
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2807331085205078
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2807902097702026
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2809562683105469
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Krishna Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2814141511917114
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2820903062820435
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2820903062820435
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2820903062820435
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2820903062820435
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2828210592269897
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2828210592269897
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'required to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1],'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2828210592269897
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'to affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2833080291748047
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2837332487106323
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2837332487106323
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2837332487106323
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2837332487106323
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2841603755950928
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2841603755950928
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2847481966018677
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2847481966018677
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.285184383392334
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench of this Court, while dealing with a mode'
Link Target 17266 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH GWALIOR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2852599620819092
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2855316400527954
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bench decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 31159 Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2857764959335327
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.285827875137329
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 17367 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA Vs. M/S BEDI & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.285827875137329
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'of Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 17367 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA Vs. M/S BEDI & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.28583824634552
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.28583824634552
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2858425378799438
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2871346473693848
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.288994550704956
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 20115 UNION OF INDIA Vs. JAGDISH AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2906605005264282
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 14619 KRISHNA MOHAN KUL @ NANI CHARAN KUL AND ANR. Vs. PRATIMA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2907261848449707
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2907261848449707
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2907743453979492
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2907743453979492
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2907743453979492
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003)'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 15
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 15
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2909091711044312
Link Content Length 15
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2912248373031616
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2912248373031616
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2918221950531006
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 476 SRI SARANGADEVAR PERIA MATAM AND ANOTHER Vs. RAMASWAMY GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2931069135665894
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2955372333526611
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2955372333526611
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2956759929656982
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.295822262763977
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Mohan Kul v. Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 3880 PRATIMA CHOWDHURY Vs. KALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.296736478805542
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.296933650970459
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2970077991485596
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2970837354660034
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.297180414199829
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.297236442565918
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 23285 Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2975631952285767
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2976088523864746
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 16397 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX WEST BENGAL - I, CALCUTTA. Vs. ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2976088523864746
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Income Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 16397 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX WEST BENGAL - I, CALCUTTA. Vs. ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2980462312698364
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2981663942337036
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.298214316368103
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2983461618423462
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2984610795974731
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2984684705734253
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2985169887542725
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.298627495765686
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2989063262939453
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 24430 Union of India Vs. Pandurang Kashinath More
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2989121675491333
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'affirmatively establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2989121675491333
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'establish it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2989121675491333
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'it. In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2989121675491333
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2990766763687134
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.2992963790893555
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3005657196044922
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3006856441497803
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.300733208656311
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3007378578186035
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3007378578186035
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.301581621170044
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.301581621170044
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content ', Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.301581621170044
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.301581621170044
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3023083209991455
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3023083209991455
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Tax, Delhi v.\n Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 25530 UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Vs. N.K. PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3023757934570312
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.304051160812378
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3042560815811157
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3057689666748047
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3061383962631226
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3062798976898193
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3062798976898193
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3063576221466064
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3068506717681885
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.306988000869751
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3075910806655884
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3077045679092407
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3077045679092407
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3077045679092407
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.307876706123352
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3082776069641113
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3085161447525024
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3085302114486694
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.30853271484375
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 1858 A. Satyanarayana Reddy and Ors Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court,Guntur & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.308988094329834
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3091423511505127
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.309396743774414
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3101445436477661
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3104443550109863
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Anil\n Rishi v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 31169 PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3105329275131226
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3106063604354858
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3125816583633423
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3127909898757935
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3131859302520752
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3132104873657227
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3137933015823364
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3137933015823364
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 17468 GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.313931941986084
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.313931941986084
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3140428066253662
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 9098 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. A. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.314333200454712
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.314333200454712
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3143898248672485
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3143898248672485
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.315705418586731
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.315705418586731
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 16933 UNION OF INDIA Vs. GURBAKSH SINGH & ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3161799907684326
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3168469667434692
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3173037767410278
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3176542520523071
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 24743 J. C. JAIN Vs. R. A. PATHAK AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3184458017349243
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3184458017349243
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3184458017349243
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3187350034713745
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3191152811050415
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3192390203475952
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3197698593139648
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3199063539505005
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3],'
Link Target 6056 SHASHI KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. Vs. SUBODH KUMAR BANERJEE SINCE DECEASED & AFTER HIM HIS L.RS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3199665546417236
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3200538158416748
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3200538158416748
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320063591003418
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Gurbaksh Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 27272 Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3201509714126587
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320196509361267
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23.'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320196509361267
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320196509361267
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.32027006149292
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 12873 C. A. RAJENDRAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3205147981643677
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3206332921981812
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320745825767517
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.320745825767517
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3208904266357422
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.32100248336792
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.32100248336792
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.32100248336792
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.321061611175537
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.321473240852356
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.321473240852356
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.321473240852356
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3214765787124634
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3218863010406494
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3218863010406494
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3218863010406494
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3224140405654907
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3225489854812622
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.322782278060913
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3235011100769043
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3237777948379517
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3241722583770752
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 1858 A. Satyanarayana Reddy and Ors Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court,Guntur & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3248895406723022
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3248895406723022
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3263546228408813
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3263546228408813
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3268755674362183
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3268755674362183
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3269182443618774
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'decision in\n Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 33651 SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3269672393798828
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.327219843864441
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.327219843864441
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3273146152496338
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 30480 RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3283931016921997
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3293951749801636
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3293964862823486
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3296643495559692
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3296968936920166
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.329908847808838
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3301703929901123
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3302052021026611
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3302534818649292
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Pratima Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.330596923828125
Link Content Length 101
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.330596923828125
Link Content Length 101
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3306703567504883
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3324933052062988
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3324933052062988
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3325326442718506
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3325326442718506
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3325326442718506
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3326793909072876
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3328263759613037
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.332956075668335
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.332956075668335
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3331174850463867
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3331174850463867
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 27
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3333179950714111
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3336433172225952
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3336433172225952
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3336433172225952
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3338935375213623
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3338935375213623
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.334307074546814
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3343521356582642
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3349671363830566
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively answer the'
Link Target 27284 HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. MUST. OF MUNSHI NATH PRASADAND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136\n[5]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '1964 SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC 136'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SC 136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '136\n[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[5] AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '(2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3357516527175903
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.335789680480957
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 14932 ALLAHABAD BANK, CALCUTTA Vs. RADHA KRISHNA MAITY AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3363533020019531
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3363778591156006
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively answer'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3370577096939087
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'fact (see Badat and Co., Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).'
Link Target 4819 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.337339162826538
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3379278182983398
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3381556272506714
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3381556272506714
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3381917476654053
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.338265299797058
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3384172916412354
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3384921550750732
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ', Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3384921550750732
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3385281562805176
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3387526273727417
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bombay v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.339389681816101
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.339389681816101
Link Content Length 95
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.33939790725708
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively answer'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3394685983657837
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively answer the'
Link Target 26174 SONAPUR TEA CO., LTD. Vs. MUST. MAZIRUNNESSA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3398228883743286
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3398228883743286
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3399903774261475
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3399903774261475
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3399903774261475
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.340228796005249
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.340228796005249
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3422374725341797
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind.'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3423408269882202
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3423408269882202
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3424228429794312
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind.'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3427150249481201
Link Content Length 87
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind.'
Link Target 21770 USHA SUBBARAO Vs. B.E. VISHVESWARIAH & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.342729091644287
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.342729091644287
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3430414199829102
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.343093752861023
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3432284593582153
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3432284593582153
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3433566093444824
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3433566093444824
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3434072732925415
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3434958457946777
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3436360359191895
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.343959927558899
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.343959927558899
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3453354835510254
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3456225395202637
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'his legal representatives and others[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 1858 A. Satyanarayana Reddy and Ors Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court,Guntur & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.346416711807251
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.346416711807251
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.346416711807251
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3466153144836426
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3466976881027222
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3466976881027222
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3466976881027222
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3469122648239136
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3470208644866943
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3470208644866943
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.347082257270813
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.347082495689392
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.347082495689392
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3474435806274414
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.347482681274414
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.347482681274414
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3481305837631226
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3481305837631226
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.348258376121521
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 11759 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA Vs. EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3482855558395386
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 8797 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ANR. Vs. DR. O.N. TRIPATHI AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3482855558395386
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 8797 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ANR. Vs. DR. O.N. TRIPATHI AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3485490083694458
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v.\n East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 6055 EAST INDIA TOBACCO CO. Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3489158153533936
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3490712642669678
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.349401831626892
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.349955439567566
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3503692150115967
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3505146503448486
Link Content Length 93
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3510959148406982
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3521485328674316
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.352751612663269
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.352846622467041
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.352846622467041
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.352846622467041
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3529928922653198
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[1], it has been'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3529928922653198
Link Content Length 16
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[2], it has been'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353058099746704
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Rakesh Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 22877 STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. RAKESH KUMAR
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353122353553772
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353391170501709
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353476643562317
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353476643562317
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353568434715271
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.353568434715271
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3538447618484497
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3538447618484497
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3538724184036255
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3546041250228882
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[3], a\n Constitution Bench'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3547223806381226
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3548057079315186
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[2], it has'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355132818222046
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3556609153747559
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[1], it has been'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3556609153747559
Link Content Length 16
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[2], it has been'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3558238744735718
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3559499979019165
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355983853340149
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355983853340149
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.355983853340149
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3560149669647217
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3560149669647217
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3562040328979492
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3562040328979492
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3562040328979492
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3562040328979492
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3562040328979492
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356230616569519
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356230616569519
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356230616569519
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356393814086914
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3566298484802246
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 8797 CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ANR. Vs. DR. O.N. TRIPATHI AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.356787085533142
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '(2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'AIR 1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529\n[4]'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC 529'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '5 SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16484 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3576842546463013
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SCC 558\n[2] (2004) 9 SCC 468\n[3] AIR 1964 SC'
Link Target 16485 AIR INDIA Vs. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3584082126617432
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 18471 IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE WORKMEN(AND CONNECTED APPEAL)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3585878610610962
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Maity and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 19082 Gour Hari Maity & Ors Vs. Shew Shankar Shaw & Anr
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3586013317108154
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3586013317108154
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3586779832839966
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3587058782577515
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3587230443954468
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3587899208068848
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 13173 CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Vs. EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3590140342712402
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 31617 PAWAN N. CHANDRA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.35915207862854
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 18471 IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE WORKMEN(AND CONNECTED APPEAL)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3591976165771484
Link Content Length 141
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '……………………………….J.\n [Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3592406511306763
Link Content Length 93
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 6579 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3592406511306763
Link Content Length 93
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Bannerjee since\n deceased and after him his legal representatives and others[3], a'
Link Target 34966 SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.359360933303833
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.359360933303833
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3593761920928955
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3593761920928955
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.359920859336853
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Celina Coelho\n Pereira (Ms) and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 3690 MS. S. Vs. SUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3606880903244019
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[2], it has'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3607501983642578
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.361169457435608
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3614130020141602
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 24532 EAST INDIA CORPORATION LTD. Vs. SHREE MEENAKSHI MILLS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3615061044692993
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3623729944229126
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 33351 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY Vs. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.362447738647461
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3624988794326782
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3624988794326782
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3624988794326782
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3626257181167603
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3628681898117065
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3628681898117065
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3628681898117065
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3631527423858643
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18388 THE INDIAN OXYGEN LIMITED Vs. WORKMEN AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3631858825683594
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3632779121398926
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3632779121398926
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and another[4], while'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3633198738098145
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 11435 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3633263111114502
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3635016679763794
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3635774850845337
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3638029098510742
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3639014959335327
Link Content Length 41
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3640785217285156
Link Content Length 24
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[1], it has been held'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3640785217285156
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3651248216629028
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 4283 NATH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3651248216629028
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 4283 NATH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3651248216629028
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 4283 NATH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3654022216796875
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.365486979484558
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 19909 R.D. GUPTA & ORS. ETC. Vs. LT. GOVERNOR. DELHI ADMN, & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3662546873092651
Link Content Length 24
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[1], it has been held'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3662546873092651
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3663084506988525
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground'
Link Target 14626 DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.366309642791748
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.366344690322876
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3665094375610352
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3665094375610352
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'and another[4], while'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3665443658828735
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'same.\n\n 20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3665443658828735
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '20. In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3665443658828735
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668222427368164
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668471574783325
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground that'
Link Target 30747 STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3668574094772339
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3669244050979614
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3669980764389038
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18556 HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. THE WORKMEN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3670005798339844
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4],'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.367388129234314
Link Content Length 21
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and others[2], it has'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3682243824005127
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3682764768600464
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3683654069900513
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 24532 EAST INDIA CORPORATION LTD. Vs. SHREE MEENAKSHI MILLS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3683881759643555
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 8836 INDIA MARINE SERVICE PRIVATE LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3686740398406982
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case,'
Link Target 11435 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3686740398406982
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case'
Link Target 11435 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3688088655471802
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3688921928405762
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3689695596694946
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3689695596694946
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3689695596694946
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3694157600402832
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 23384 EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Vs. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3696134090423584
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 18471 IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE WORKMEN(AND CONNECTED APPEAL)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3698737621307373
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in'
Link Target 18471 IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE WORKMEN(AND CONNECTED APPEAL)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3699973821640015
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 18471 IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE WORKMEN(AND CONNECTED APPEAL)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3701928853988647
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18388 THE INDIAN OXYGEN LIMITED Vs. WORKMEN AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3702143430709839
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20115 UNION OF INDIA Vs. JAGDISH AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.370216965675354
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'East India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 24532 EAST INDIA CORPORATION LTD. Vs. SHREE MEENAKSHI MILLS LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3707466125488281
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3707466125488281
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3707466125488281
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3707466125488281
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3711521625518799
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election'
Link Target 6944 AJIT SINGH Vs. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3711562156677246
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[7],\n the High Court had non-suited the landlord on the ground that'
Link Target 13676 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3714300394058228
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.371824026107788
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 14193 RAM KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3718304634094238
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3718786239624023
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3719388246536255
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 3498 THE STATE OF BOMBAY Vs. BOMBAY EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS.(With Connected Ap
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.371970772743225
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the High'
Link Target 24117 HARI KISHAN Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3721905946731567
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372218132019043
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372218132019043
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372257947921753
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372257947921753
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3723186254501343
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3723186254501343
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3723186254501343
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 26355 C.I.T,NEW DELHI Vs. M/S MARUTI UDYOG LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3725261688232422
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372603178024292
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726282119750977
Link Content Length 23
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726288080215454
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726288080215454
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726288080215454
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726288080215454
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.372635841369629
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of election case, this'
Link Target 11435 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726717233657837
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3726876974105835
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3727478981018066
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3728797435760498
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'In A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 23463 IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER Vs. IN THE MATTER OF 'K' A JUDICIAL OFFICER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3729567527770996
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the'
Link Target 3498 THE STATE OF BOMBAY Vs. BOMBAY EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS.(With Connected Ap
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3730770349502563
Link Content Length 57
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731087446212769
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 7095 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. ALL INDIA TEA AND TRADING CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'A. Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3731745481491089
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3733090162277222
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings of'
Link Target 35490 RAM KRISHAN AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF DELHI(With connected appeal)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.373499870300293
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18556 HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. THE WORKMEN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3738363981246948
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3738363981246948
Link Content Length 75
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3738363981246948
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3742222785949707
Link Content Length 17
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'others[2], it has'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3748664855957031
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3749209642410278
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3750663995742798
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 19909 R.D. GUPTA & ORS. ETC. Vs. LT. GOVERNOR. DELHI ADMN, & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3753166198730469
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3753280639648438
Link Content Length 71
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3753596544265747
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3753855228424072
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3753950595855713
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3754390478134155
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3754769563674927
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3754769563674927
Link Content Length 72
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3757251501083374
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[2], it has been'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.375889778137207
Link Content Length 141
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '……………………………….J.\n [Dipak Misra]\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.37632417678833
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20115 UNION OF INDIA Vs. JAGDISH AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3764735460281372
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3765215873718262
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3767273426055908
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3767273426055908
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3769915103912354
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3769983053207397
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3770171403884888
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3770631551742554
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.377515435218811
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Raghavamma and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.377515435218811
Link Content Length 88
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.377515435218811
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.377515435218811
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3775622844696045
Link Content Length 82
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept'
Link Target 8836 INDIA MARINE SERVICE PRIVATE LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3777655363082886
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 34053 RAMESH KUMAR Vs. RAM KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3777756690979004
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in'
Link Target 8836 INDIA MARINE SERVICE PRIVATE LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3778380155563354
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the facts rests'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.378004789352417
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3781664371490479
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3781664371490479
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3782072067260742
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.378256916999817
Link Content Length 64
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'India Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 2400 C.I.T. CENTRAL BOMBAY Vs. JALAN TRADING CO. (P) LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3783549070358276
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3783549070358276
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3784875869750977
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with the\n pleadings'
Link Target 3498 THE STATE OF BOMBAY Vs. BOMBAY EDUCATION SOCIETY AND OTHERS.(With Connected Ap
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3786982297897339
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3786982297897339
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3787580728530884
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3787580728530884
Link Content Length 61
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3787915706634521
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving the'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3787915706634521
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden of\n proving'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3787972927093506
Link Content Length 18
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein,'
Link Target 1301 RAJ KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3789398670196533
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 11595 A. SURESH, ETC.ETC. Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANOTHER, ETC.ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3790839910507202
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3794180154800415
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3800830841064453
Link Content Length 29
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802319765090942
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802319765090942
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802435398101807
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802435398101807
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802435398101807
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802435398101807
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3802435398101807
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3804415464401245
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3804415464401245
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.380447506904602
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.380495548248291
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.380579948425293
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Trading Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 30874 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DURGA TRADING CO. & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3806179761886597
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3806179761886597
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3807215690612793
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'another v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3807215690612793
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'v. A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3808262348175049
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18388 THE INDIAN OXYGEN LIMITED Vs. WORKMEN AND OTHERS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3809764385223389
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3811672925949097
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3811672925949097
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3811672925949097
Link Content Length 74
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3813302516937256
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3814547061920166
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation or'
Link Target 3293 AJANTA PHARMA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF I.T-9,MUMBAI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3816908597946167
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382024884223938
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 11595 A. SURESH, ETC.ETC. Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANOTHER, ETC.ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3820840120315552
Link Content Length 81
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation or'
Link Target 15499 MR. KAILASH & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OR UTTAR PRADESH
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3823949098587036
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3826258182525635
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3827489614486694
Link Content Length 78
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation'
Link Target 10021 THE MANAGEMENT OF EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. WORKERS & STAFF EMPLOYED UNDER IT AND OTHERS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 91
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 89
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.382771611213684
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3830180168151855
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3831266164779663
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 7712 A. C. SHARMA Vs. DELHI ADMINISTRATION
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3833253383636475
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],\n the'
Link Target 18556 HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. THE WORKMEN AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383625864982605
Link Content Length 85
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383625864982605
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383625864982605
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 32132 THE STATE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Vs. M/s. M. A. NOOR MOHAMMED AND CO.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383673906326294
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383711814880371
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383711814880371
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383711814880371
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3837380409240723
Link Content Length 67
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and'
Link Target 11309 A. K. ROY, ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.383968710899353
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3841155767440796
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3841155767440796
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.384421467781067
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3844424486160278
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3845858573913574
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Singh[1], it has been held that'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3847897052764893
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3848928213119507
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3848928213119507
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3848928213119507
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3848928213119507
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 49
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010)'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 31
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849296569824219
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849869966506958
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849869966506958
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content ']\n\nNew Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3849869966506958
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'New Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 35662 M/s. Duncans Industries Ltd., Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.385416865348816
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'others[2], it has been'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3855141401290894
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and others[7],'
Link Target 20115 UNION OF INDIA Vs. JAGDISH AND ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3857088088989258
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3857088088989258
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3857088088989258
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3860085010528564
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of'
Link Target 11309 A. K. ROY, ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3860085010528564
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus'
Link Target 11309 A. K. ROY, ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3860207796096802
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3860692977905273
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of proof'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3863407373428345
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 1134 A. V. S. NARASIMHA RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.386451005935669
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 2231 A. CHOWGULE & CO. LTD. Vs. GOA FOUNDATION & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3864718675613403
Link Content Length 32
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3866426944732666
Link Content Length 48
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3866565227508545
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3866565227508545
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]:'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867391347885132
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867391347885132
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867391347885132
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867391347885132
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867930173873901
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867930173873901
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3867930173873901
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3868931531906128
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3870195150375366
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 1065 CALCUTTA INSURANCE Co. LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3870195150375366
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 1065 CALCUTTA INSURANCE Co. LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3871111869812012
Link Content Length 22
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4'
Link Target 15010 S. SURESH Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3871111869812012
Link Content Length 20
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule'
Link Target 15010 S. SURESH Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.387498140335083
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3875319957733154
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[1], it has been held that the burden'
Link Target 4601 SATNAM SINGH AND ORS.S.K.SINGAL AND ORS. Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA,CHANDIGARH, THROUGH IT
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3876484632492065
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3876484632492065
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006)'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3876484632492065
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1]'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3878382444381714
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof and onus of proof'
Link Target 11309 A. K. ROY, ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3882919549942017
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of'
Link Target 8844 D. A. V. COLLEGE ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3884528875350952
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 34053 RAMESH KUMAR Vs. RAM KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3886278867721558
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3888064622879028
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 7712 A. C. SHARMA Vs. DELHI ADMINISTRATION
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3888081312179565
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3888081312179565
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3888081312179565
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3889498710632324
Link Content Length 30
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3891793489456177
Link Content Length 25
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while'
Link Target 1301 RAJ KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3892518281936646
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3892518281936646
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3894176483154297
Link Content Length 68
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.389493465423584
Link Content Length 45
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3896558284759521
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3897954225540161
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3898197412490845
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3898342847824097
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 15074 STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS A Vs. CONSTRUCTION INDIA
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3899725675582886
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3899874687194824
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3900960683822632
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 20601 J.K. IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD., KANPUR Vs. THE IRON AND STEEL MAZDOOR UNION, KANPUR(with connected ap
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3901180028915405
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3901180028915405
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3901180028915405
Link Content Length 43
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.390167474746704
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 2231 A. CHOWGULE & CO. LTD. Vs. GOA FOUNDATION & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3902627229690552
Link Content Length 26
Link Content Word Count 4
Link Content '[4], while\n making a'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3904057741165161
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3904057741165161
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3904057741165161
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3905580043792725
Link Content Length 62
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden of proof'
Link Target 8844 D. A. V. COLLEGE ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3905649185180664
Link Content Length 28
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3907276391983032
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.390795350074768
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3909785747528076
Link Content Length 94
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 3949 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION Vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.391133427619934
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3912670612335205
Link Content Length 79
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3914859294891357
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3914859294891357
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3914859294891357
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3917776346206665
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3917776346206665
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3919823169708252
Link Content Length 35
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[6] wherein, while dealing with'
Link Target 1920 JALAN TRADING CO. (PRIVATE LTD.) Vs. MILL MAZDOOR UNION(With Connected Petitions)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3922039270401
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 7712 A. C. SHARMA Vs. DELHI ADMINISTRATION
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3926259279251099
Link Content Length 63
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3927981853485107
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3929139375686646
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3929139375686646
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3929139375686646
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3930662870407104
Link Content Length 36
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.393191933631897
Link Content Length 34
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Kumar[6] wherein, while dealing'
Link Target 34053 RAMESH KUMAR Vs. RAM KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3932491540908813
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC 217'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3932491540908813
Link Content Length 58
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC 217\n[8]'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3932491540908813
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '1964 SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3932491540908813
Link Content Length 54
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC 217'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3932491540908813
Link Content Length 50
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'SC 538\n[6] (2003) 8 SCC 673\n[7] (2010) 1 SCC'
Link Target 11959 PRIYADARSHINI COL.OF COMPUTER SC.& ANR Vs. MANISH KUMAR & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3933480978012085
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3934309482574463
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation'
Link Target 2216 Workmen Employed Under IT Shramik Sena Vs. M/s Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3934649229049683
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3934649229049683
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 5634 PRATAP CHAND Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3936768770217896
Link Content Length 42
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3936768770217896
Link Content Length 40
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus:'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3936768770217896
Link Content Length 39
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3940373659133911
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2]'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3940373659133911
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3940373659133911
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 8333 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3941435813903809
Link Content Length 44
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3944177627563477
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3944177627563477
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3944860696792603
Link Content Length 70
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3944860696792603
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'and others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 7481 SUDHIR AND ORS Vs. VS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3945260047912598
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 7712 A. C. SHARMA Vs. DELHI ADMINISTRATION
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3946542739868164
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 5
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3946542739868164
Link Content Length 37
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3947677612304688
Link Content Length 80
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'A. Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3947677612304688
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'Chenchamma and another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 26830 SHYAM SUNDER AND OTHERS Vs. RAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3949719667434692
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 1065 CALCUTTA INSURANCE Co. LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3950283527374268
Link Content Length 76
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively answer'
Link Target 21924 A. ROBERT Vs. THE UNITED INSURANCE CO. LTD.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3950366973876953
Link Content Length 33
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates'
Link Target 15010 S. SURESH Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.395057201385498
Link Content Length 60
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content 'another[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 26631 M. C. GUPTA ETC. Vs. A. K. GUPTA & ORS. ETC.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3954064846038818
Link Content Length 77
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558\n[2]'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3954064846038818
Link Content Length 73
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC 558'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3954064846038818
Link Content Length 69
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Delhi;\nJanuary 08, 2013\n\n\n-----------------------\n[1] (2006) 5 SCC'
Link Target 1344 DELHI CLOTH & GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. Vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3958054780960083
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts'
Link Target 5687 Secretary to Government & Ors Vs. M/s Peekay Re-Rolling Mills (P) Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3958163261413574
Link Content Length 59
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3958508968353271
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts'
Link Target 5687 Secretary to Government & Ors Vs. M/s Peekay Re-Rolling Mills (P) Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3962584733963013
Link Content Length 86
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3963817358016968
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3965096473693848
Link Content Length 51
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to'
Link Target 14379 COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTHEALTH AND MEDICAL EDU. Vs. DR. ASHOK KUMAR KOHLI
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.397071123123169
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.397071123123169
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.397106647491455
Link Content Length 83
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts'
Link Target 15930 PURUSHOTTAM UMEDBHAI & CO. Vs. M/S. MANILAL AND SONS (IN CONNECTED APPEALS)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3971095085144043
Link Content Length 94
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Woodward Governor India Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be'
Link Target 6950 GHATGE & PATIL CONCERN'S EMPLOYEES' UNION Vs. GHATGE & PATIL (TRANSPORTS) PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3971487283706665
Link Content Length 90
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts'
Link Target 15930 PURUSHOTTAM UMEDBHAI & CO. Vs. M/S. MANILAL AND SONS (IN CONNECTED APPEALS)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3972758054733276
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 8
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3972758054733276
Link Content Length 46
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3974025249481201
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 12
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud,'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3974025249481201
Link Content Length 65
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3977736234664917
Link Content Length 52
Link Content Word Count 9
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3978147506713867
Link Content Length 104
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts\n regularly'
Link Target 5687 Secretary to Government & Ors Vs. M/s Peekay Re-Rolling Mills (P) Ltd
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3980112075805664
Link Content Length 56
Link Content Word Count 10
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.398504376411438
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 1065 CALCUTTA INSURANCE Co. LTD. Vs. THEIR WORKMEN
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3985570669174194
Link Content Length 38
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Co.[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that'
Link Target 15010 S. SURESH Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3985675573349
Link Content Length 47
Link Content Word Count 6
Link Content 'Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3986390829086304
Link Content Length 84
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content 'others[2], it has been ruled\n thus: -\n “When fraud, misrepresentation'
Link Target 3296 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CEN.P.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF I.T.& ANR.
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3988827466964722
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3989731073379517
Link Content Length 104
Link Content Word Count 13
Link Content '[8]: -\n\n “One more principle needs to be kept in mind. Accounts\n regularly'
Link Target 15930 PURUSHOTTAM UMEDBHAI & CO. Vs. M/S. MANILAL AND SONS (IN CONNECTED APPEALS)
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.3990200757980347
Link Content Length 55
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content 'Private Limited[8]: -\n\n “One more principle'
Link Target 16863 M/S PULLICAR MILLS LIMITED Vs. V RANGASAMY AND ORS
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.399065613746643
Link Content Length 53
Link Content Word Count 7
Link Content '[4], while\n making a distinction between burden'
Link Target 5197 COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
================================================================================
Distance (Score) 1.399566650390625
Link Content Length 66
Link Content Word Count 11
Link Content '[5]).\n\n 23. Rule 4 stipulates that a defendant must not evasively'
Link Target 8616 A. Satyanarayana & Ors Vs. S. Purushotham & Ors
================================================================================
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment