Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@lucasgonze
Last active August 29, 2015 14:26
Show Gist options
  • Save lucasgonze/b3573cf31816098a7aa5 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save lucasgonze/b3573cf31816098a7aa5 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Advantage: middle

Artists now spend significantly more time touring than they did in the pre-Napster days (estimates here vary) and command close to 35% more per ticket on an inflation-adjusted basis. As a result, the US concert industry has nearly tripled since 1999 (when recorded music sales peaked).

Yet, what’s typically overlooked by this narrative is that the vast majority of this growth – 83% to be exact – has gone to non-Top 100 touring artists. In 2000, the Top 100 tours (which included ‘NSYNC, Metallica and Snoop Dogg & Dr. Dre) collected nearly 90% of annual concert revenues. Today, that share has fallen to only 44%. Furthermore, the Top 100 tours have faced stagnant revenues for close to a decade, with both ticket prices and sales largely flat:

So in all, the pains and changes over the past 15 years have been unevenly distributed.

The most popular artists have seen their primary income stream, recorded music sales, collapse by more than 70% in inflation-adjusted terms since 2000 (~$14B), while their concert revenues have increased by “only” $600M (or 32%)

Meanwhile, independents – the vast majority of whom never generated significant revenue from physical sales – are making considerably more from concerts than at any point in recent history (+$3.2B, or +1,150%) and capturing an increased share of what recorded sales remain

The birth of the recording industry coincided with movement of revenue to fewer musicians. Recordings scale in a way that live doesn't.

If the industry is restructuring around live music, the spoils will be spread among more musicians.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment