| // ~/server/api/sse.ts | |
| export default defineEventHandler(async (event) => { | |
| if (!process.dev) return { disabled: true } | |
| // Enable SSE endpoint | |
| setHeader(event, 'cache-control', 'no-cache') | |
| setHeader(event, 'connection', 'keep-alive') | |
| setHeader(event, 'content-type', 'text/event-stream') | |
| setResponseStatus(event, 200) |
Note This is a little out of date. Rust has made some progress on some points, however many points still apply.
Swift shares Rust's enthusiasm for zero-cost abstractions, but also emphasizes progressive disclosure. Progressive disclosure requires that language features should be added in a way that doesn't complicate the rest of the language. This means that Swift aims to be simple for simple tasks, and only as complex as needed for complex tasks.
| apiVersion: v1 | |
| kind: Namespace | |
| metadata: | |
| name: sftp | |
| --- | |
| kind: Service | |
| apiVersion: v1 | |
| metadata: |
| import Foundation | |
| struct EquatableValueSequence<T: Equatable> { | |
| static func ==(lhs: EquatableValueSequence<T>, rhs: T) -> Bool { | |
| return lhs.values.contains(rhs) | |
| } | |
| static func ==(lhs: T, rhs: EquatableValueSequence<T>) -> Bool { | |
| return rhs == lhs | |
| } |
Modern Cocoa development involves a lot of asynchronous programming using closures and completion handlers, but these APIs are hard to use. This gets particularly problematic when many asynchronous operations are used, error handling is required, or control flow between asynchronous calls gets complicated. This proposal describes a language extension to make this a lot more natural and less error prone.
This paper introduces a first class Coroutine model to Swift. Functions can opt into to being async, allowing the programmer to compose complex logic involving asynchronous operations, leaving the compiler in charge of producing the necessary closures and state machines to implement that logic.
Frequently, closures are used as completion callbacks for asynchronous operations, such as when dealing with network requests. It is quite common to model these sorts of operations in such a way that an object instance represents a request/response transaction, for example:
One of the best ways to investigate a problematic Xamarin.Android Binding is to first ensure you have the proper tooling available:
Below is the list of modern JS frameworks and almost frameworks – React, Vue, Angular, Ember and others.
All files were downloaded from https://cdnjs.com and named accordingly.
Output from ls command is stripped out (irrelevant stuff)
$ ls -lhS
566K Jan 4 22:03 angular2.min.js
Modern Cocoa development involves a lot of asynchronous programming using blocks and NSOperations. A lot of APIs are exposing blocks and they are more natural to write a lot of logic, so we'll only focus on block-based APIs.
Block-based APIs are hard to use when number of operations grows and dependencies between them become more complicated. In this paper I introduce asynchronous semantics and Promise type to Swift language (borrowing ideas from design of throw-try-catch and optionals). Functions can opt-in to become async, programmer can compose complex logic involving asynchronous operations while compiler produces necessary closures to implement that logic. This proposal does not propose new runtime model, nor "actors" or "coroutines".