Created
November 10, 2012 22:29
-
-
Save beh/4052761 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Apple early iPhone subsidy?
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When I say subsidised what I mean is that money was flowing from the customer trough the | |
carrier ending up at 1 Infinite Loop. | |
My basis for this "conspiracy" stems from the following: | |
1. The price of the iPhone increased when it went world wide. Likely to make up for lost income from AT&T. | |
2. Think that the normal Apple MSRP margins are not reflected by the $499 / $599 price point it was originally sold on. | |
3. The infamous price drop of 2007 to $399 without any change in the contract terms from AT&T underpins your claim that there | |
was no subsidy of the device from AT&T towards customer end price. | |
4. The GAAP subscription accounting model also hints that Apple will get paid per user over time. | |
My gut feeling from all this is; until AT&T started to subsidise the iPhone (from 3Gs - summer 2008?) they | |
paid Apple part of what the customer paid them over time. That is a form of subsidy. And if Apple were to | |
sell the phone completely unlocked without any carrier it would have carried a higher price than the | |
original $499 / $599, later $399 price tag. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment