Try to be mindful of your words in written communications. Here are some tricks to leaving a good impression with written words online.
When writing imperative sentences, try not to start your sentences with "don't." Try the word "avoid" instead.
⚠️ "Don't use big words."
This imperative command can make the reader feel like they have no choice on the matter. It implies that the decision lies solely on you, which implies that you don't want to listen to their feedback.
Note
to active Office without crack, just follow https://github.com/WindowsAddict/IDM-Activation-Script,
you wiil only need to run
irm https://massgrave.dev/ias | iex
This simple script will take a picture of a whiteboard and use parts of the ImageMagick library with sane defaults to clean it up tremendously.
The script is here:
#!/bin/bash
convert "$1" -morphology Convolve DoG:15,100,0 -negate -normalize -blur 0x1 -channel RBG -level 60%,91%,0.1 "$2"
| #!/bin/bash | |
| if [ $# -lt 3 ]; then | |
| echo -e "hhhh v0.2\nUsage: hhhh <author> <from date> <to date>" | |
| exit | |
| fi | |
| pretty="--pretty=%C(blue)%ad%Creset %C(yellow)%h%C(green)%d%Creset %C(blue)%s %C(magenta) [%an]%Creset" | |
| fl=`git log "$pretty" --author "$1" --since "$2" --until "$3"|awk ' ORS="\n" { $4=$5=$6=$7=""; print $0}'` | |
| echo "$fl"|awk 'FS=" " { gsub(/(\[[A-Za-z0-9&#\ ]+\] ?|Merge.*)/,"");\ | |
| if (a != $1){ print sep$1sep$2 } else { print $2 } }\ | |
| { a=$1; sep="\n==========\n" }' |
| # First the end result of what we want: | |
| class Foo | |
| before_hook :whoa | |
| before_hook :amazing | |
| def test | |
| puts "This is kinda cool!" | |
| end |
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real
