-
-
Save KOLANICH/2b24dfc9e49d772d914dae38e8d1c8d9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
// Set to 0.01 for higher definition curves (renders slower) | |
$fs = 0.15; | |
module cornerCut(sizeX, sizeY, size, r){ | |
translate([sizeX-r, sizeY-r, 0]){ | |
difference(){ | |
translate([0, 0, -size/2]){ | |
cube(size=[r, r, size]); | |
} | |
cylinder(h = size, r = r, center = true); | |
} | |
} | |
} | |
module twoCuts(sizeX, sizeY, size, r){ | |
cornerCut(sizeX, sizeY, size, r); | |
mirror([0, 1, 0]) | |
cornerCut(sizeX, sizeY, size, r); | |
} | |
module fourCuts(sizeX, sizeY, size, r){ | |
twoCuts(sizeX, sizeY, size, r); | |
mirror([1, 0, 0]) | |
twoCuts(sizeX, sizeY, size, r); | |
} | |
module roundedcube(size = [1, 1, 1], center = false, radius = [0.5, 0.5, 0.5], apply_to = "all") { | |
// If single value, convert to [x, y, z] vector | |
size = (size[0] == undef) ? [size, size, size] : size; | |
radius = (radius[0] == undef) ? [radius, radius, radius] : radius; | |
transl = (center == false) ? size/2 : [0, 0, 0]; | |
translate(transl){ | |
difference(){ | |
cube(size=size, center=true); | |
union(){ | |
if(radius[2] != 0) | |
fourCuts(size[0]/2, size[1]/2, size[2], radius[2]); | |
if(radius[0] != 0) | |
rotate([0, 90, 0]) | |
fourCuts(size[2]/2, size[1]/2, size[0], radius[0]); | |
if(radius[1] != 0) | |
rotate([90, 0, 0]) | |
fourCuts(size[0]/2, size[2]/2, size[1], radius[1]); | |
} | |
} | |
} | |
} |
Hi @KOLANICH , sorry I'm only just now seeing this!! Your fork looks really good, you've made it a lot clearer...
I haven't been printing for years now... But you're right, putting it into a repo would be good.. there doesn't appear to be a merge flow with Gists.... I might be too late by now, but I'll start recommending your version to people if they ask, and let me know if you're still interested in the repo -- I know it's been a while
It looks like it would be well worth integrating @ggs67's changes as well:
https://gist.github.com/ggs67/ff6ba8caf5a1871d285c5c758dce0575
And because of the way you cleaned it up, I think it'll be possible to combine both changes smoothly
let me know if you're still interested in the repo -- I know it's been a while
Having it in a PRable repo will benefit everyone. Since it is easy to do, it should just be done.
sorry I'm only just now seeing this!!
It's OK. It's opensource, noone owes anyone anything.
I might be too late by now
It's never too late.
Since it is easy to do
I wouldn't have the same motivation since I have not printed in years, but I can see where it would be easy to do in some cases or at least easy to say it's easy to do :D I don't use GitHub for much personal stuff in the past few years either
I will go ahead and do it soon, really it wouldn't be too hard yes just some time spent. And maybe I'll just put a link to the new repo in the original file. Thanks again
@groovenectar, could you pull this and move your stuff into a regular repo?